Episode 176: Optimize Your Wealth Reservoir: The Smart Way to Balance Age and Funding with a Whole Life Insurance Policy

Listen here on our website:

Or jump to this episode on your favourite platform:

Watch Now!

Is saving your age with a backdated participating whole life insurance policy really the smartest financial move—or could it cost you more than it saves?

If you’ve ever considered using participating whole life insurance for wealth preservation, you’ve likely heard about backdating to lock in a younger age. But what if that age-saving strategy means compromising your cash value in the short term—or worse, limiting your ability to fund the policy fully? Whether you’re starting a corporate-owned participating whole life insurance policy or planning for long-term estate growth, the funding strategy you choose can make or break your outcome.

In this episode, you’ll discover:

• How backdating a policy by 6 to 12 months affects both cash value and death benefit over time.
• Why saving age isn’t always worth it—especially if you can’t max fund in year one.
• When a backdated policy makes sense, particularly for those with a large upfront lump sum to contribute.

Press play to learn how to structure your life insurance strategy for maximum flexibility, long-term value, and alignment with your wealth goals.

Resources:

• Ready to take a deep dive and learn how to generate personal tax free cash flow from your corporation? Enroll in our FREE masterclass here. 
• Book a Discovery Call with Kyle to review your corporate (or personal) wealth strategy to help you overcome your current struggle and take the next step in your Canadian Wealth Building Journey!
• Discover which phase of wealth creation you are in. Take our quick assessment and you’ll receive a custom wealth-building pathway that matches your phase and learn our CRA compliant tax optimized strategies. Take that assessment here.
• Dig into our Ultimate Investment Book List
• Follow/Connect with us on social media for daily posts and conversations about business, finance, and investment on LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook [Kyle’s Profile, Our Business Page], TikTok and TwitterX. 
  

Calling All Canadian Incorporated Business Owners & Investors:

Consider reaching out to Kyle if you’ve been…

• …taking a salary with a goal of stuffing RRSPs;
• …investing inside your corporation without a passive income tax minimization strategy;
• …letting a large sum of liquid assets sit in low interest earning savings accounts;
• …investing corporate dollars into GICs, dividend stocks/funds, or other investments attracting cordporate passive income taxes at greater than 50%; or,
• …wondering whether your current corporate wealth management strategy is optimal for your specific situation.

Financial freedom in Canada takes more than income — it takes strategy. Whether you’re a seasoned entrepreneur, high-earning professional, or building wealth through real estate, mastering the four phases of a healthy financial plan is non-negotiable. This podcast unpacks the smartest Canadian tax strategies, corporate structuring moves, and investment tactics that create lasting wealth. From optimizing RRSP room and leveraging real estate to balancing salary vs dividends and planning your legacy, we focus on actionable insights tailored for business owners and investors. In this episode, we explore the lesser-known strategy of backdating participating whole life insurance policies—revealing when saving your age supports long-term value and when it actually limits your cash flow and funding flexibility. Learn how proper policy design impacts corporate-owned life insurance, capital dividend account strategies, and early cash value planning. Each episode helps you align personal financial decisions with long-term wealth goals using a proven Canadian blueprint for financial growth and security.

Transcript:

What if I told you that backdating a permanent life insurance policy by just a few months could potentially save you thousands in long-term insurance costs, but could actually leave you with less cash value in the short term if you’re not careful. In today’s episode, we’re going to break down a real client scenario where different strategies were tested.

We looked at regular dating a policy, a six month back date and even a full 364 day back date. The results were surprisingly close, but not for the reasons you might think. If you’ve ever wondered whether saving your age is more important than max funding early, this is the episode for you. Now, if you’re wondering what the heck is a back date anyway, don’t worry, we’re gonna summarize that as well. This is a Canadian Wealth Secrets.

episode where we are going to take the inspiration from a client scenario. It’s actually spouses, Imran and Sonia. And we’re going to tackle the nuance, but important question. When is saving your age the right way to go? And when is it worth just letting it go? All right, my friends, here we go. First and foremost, let’s chat a little bit about

back dating as you may or may not know when we talk about high early cash value life insurance strategies on the podcast. You’ll know that as the resident math geeks here we love to analyze and we understand how policies can be designed to really help serve different reasons. Okay. Our audience typically likes to preserve high cash value early. However, there are situations where

a high death benefit is really the right goal or the right need for a specific client or a specific situation. So understanding the knobs that you need to pull in order to help clients achieve the best goal for their potential outcome or the actual goal that they have for their wealth building journey, estate planning or investment needs can vary from person to person. Now, in this particular case, we’re talking about

to a young couple, they’re in their middle ages, and they were talking about max funding a new policy. It’s gonna be corporate owned, so they get all the benefits of the capital dividend account and the net death benefit, being able to pay out tax free and lots of benefits there. But when it came down to actually putting this policy in force, they were grappling with the idea of whether it’s worth saving age or whether it’s worth.

actually putting more money into the policy now. As you can imagine, there’s a little bit of, there’s some nuance here that’s really important to note. The younger we are with insurance, the cheaper the insurance itself is. Now keep in mind when we run illustrations for high early cash value policies, or maybe those policies that are really seeking high death benefit initially and not really concerned about cash value.

we can look at an entire illustration and that illustration is based on the current dividend scale that the insurer is paying out of their participating fund, which is really helpful for us to really get a sense of what may or may not happen over the life of the policy based on different funding schedules. So when it comes to high early cash value, it’s all about trying to fund the policy to the max in the early years. Well,

The real question though is like what matters more early funding or back dating these policies when we backdate a policy what we’re doing is we’re saving age. Many insurers allow you to backdate the policy up to six months. Why six months is really important is because insurance companies will round your age to your closest birthday. So if you’re born in January let’s say and you are putting the policy in force when it’s March they’re going to round

backwards to your last birthday. However, if it’s your birthday is in January and you are putting a policy in force in say November, they’re going to like round up to the next birthday. And that can obviously have an impact because if I’m always a year older on paper, they are essentially going to be calculating the cost of insurance in the background behind the illustration with a

essentially a higher risk because you are now one year closer to the average age or life expectancy of female male with smoker non smoker and all the other details that they put into this formula. So saving age is always a great idea when we can but there’s nuance here that’s really important. So if I could just save my age and say can I be a year younger I would take it but the problem is when we backdate by six months or with some companies

all the way back to 364 days, so almost a full year. What that does is it actually fast forwards your policy in time. And basically what it says is it’s like, if I go back six months, basically I’m putting a policy in force today, let’s pretend it’s June 15th, I put that policy in force today. What they’re saying is you actually put the policy in force six months ago in order to save age.

And that also means that the whole first year premium is due plus in six months from now, you’ll be paying year twos premium. So that means you’re going to be paying two full years in 18 months instead of 24 months. This can have an impact on how much you may or can put into the policy, which may hinder your ability to reach max funding. So let’s look at the full 364 day

back date. Why someone might consider doing this is someone who actually wants to get two full years of premium in upfront and then they just want to pay every year after that. With the six month you’re kind of putting it offset you’re offsetting your premium date by six months so you’re going to pay the whole first year now but then you’re going to pay your whole first second year or I should say your whole second year not your whole first second year in six months from that date.

So this is really important when we’re trying to think of our funding schedule, because if our goal is high early cash value, we wanna try to be max funding our policy in the early years. If I backdate a policy a whole year or 364 days, and I have to pay two full years of premium now, but I only have one full premium, it is likely that I’m actually gonna min fund or minimum fund the first year and…

potentially only minimum or minimum slightly higher than minimum fund the second year to get this policy going. So it’s really important when we’re starting to think about how we structure our policy that sometimes the actual savings in the background for back dating actually isn’t worth giving up your ability to max fund the policy. Up on the screen for those with YouTube or watching on YouTube,

you will see a policy, we’re looking at a $20,000 per year max funded policy here, and we’re calling this the regular dated policy. This is a 39 year old individual, and we’re gonna say their birthday was June 15th, 1985. That’s what this policy is running for. And what you’re gonna notice is there’s a minimum premium they can contribute, which is about $7,500.

the cash premium, the maximum premium they can contribute is 20,000. And you’ll notice that over time that cash value is gonna continue to grow as we typically see with high early cash value policies, you’re gonna hit the break even point somewhere around year four or five. That’s usually also the early offset point given current dividend scales for most companies, including this one that we’re looking at here. You’ll also notice,

the death benefit that we’re accumulating over time. If you have a company, the capital dividend account credits listed there as well as the adjusted cost basis. So we’re putting 20,000 into this policy. If we backdate the policy by six months, what that does, and I’m gonna just go to the next tab here, you’ll notice that while their actual age is 39, you’ll notice that they, and actually, sorry, forgive me, in the first scenario, their actual age is 40.

And when we backdate by six months, you’ll notice that their age is actually now 39, meaning the end of year one, it’s going to record them as only being 40 years old, as you’ll see in the table. Couple things happen. First off, the minimum premium goes down a little bit. Why? Because the cost of insurance is slightly lower. Now this person being only around 40 years old, actually 40 years old and backdated to 39,

is actually not going to see a huge amount of savings because they’re not that old. However, this gets more and more dramatic when we put policies in when we are older. So if we’re in our 50s or even early 60s, you’ll notice that backdating will actually have a much more significant impact and that might influence your decision as to whether you should backdate even if it means not max funding in the first year. However, here for this particular example,

You’ll notice that the cash value is going down slightly for this individual because we backdated by six months, but the death benefit has actually increased a little bit as well. So because they are actually a younger individual on paper, they’re actually going to get more death benefit. So in the first case, in the regular dating case, they’re going to have about $17,200 of cash value by the end of year one. If they max fund,

$20,000 and they’re going to have a death benefit of about $423,000. If we do a six month back date, what we’re going to have is $16,988 of cash value, about $300 off in cash value initially. However, the death benefit is going to start actually a little bit higher here. We have $436,000 of death benefit. So there’s a little bit of give and take here. And basically what

Why this happens and why this works this way is because the person who’s backdated their birthday, first of all, the costs are a little cheaper. So the insurance is cheaper for them to buy, which is great. But they also have a longer runway until their expected age of life or when they plan to, or not to plan, but when stats suggest that this male nonsmoker may actually pass. And therefore the cash value starts slightly lower.

However, the death benefits start slightly higher. And if we were to fund this over 10 full years, $20,000 for 10 full years, and then stop funding this policy, and then we actually go out, you’ll see after 10 years, when we do a regular date, we’ve got a cash value of about $245,000.

and a death benefit of about $867,000. So quite substantial, a nice little opportunity fund that we’ve crafted here. We like to call it the wealth reservoir for many people. When we look at the backdated policy, the cash value is at $245,000 as well. So at about the same cash value. However, death benefit’s at $894,000. So that death benefit is still higher

still. And if we continue to scale out, you’ll notice that by let’s look at age 70, they’ve no longer contributed after 10 years. So age 70, what you’re going to notice is that we have a scenario or actually I should say after 30 years in both cases, okay, one one’s going to suggest that they’re a year younger. After 30 years in the regular dated scenario, you’re going to have about

$625,000 of cash value. The backdated policy is going to have about 627, 628,000. So now the cash value is starting to sort of, you know, separate itself from how equivalent it was in the earlier. So we’re starting to see a little bit better cash value growth in the later years. Nothing crazy, like nothing to write home about here, but it is happening. However, on the death,

Benefit side, you’ll see about 1,064,000 of death benefit in the regular dated policy, whereas in the backdated policy, we have 1,095,000. So we are still seeing like about a $30,000 difference in death benefit. And over time, that cash value is going to slowly take off on the other policy and the death benefit’s going to continue to be higher.

over time. Now, this would be more dramatic if we continued funding these policies for longer than 10 years as well, right? The longer we fund them, the more dramatic the differences will become. However, if we chose to minimum fund that first year on the backdated policy, we’d actually be hindering that policy. And we’d actually see less benefit, we would see some initial death benefit, it may be comparative.

but the cash value would suffer and the future growth of that policy would suffer. So in this case, what I would argue is that in many cases, if we’re not intending to maximum fund the first couple of years of our policy, the backdate is actually not going to work to our advantage. It could actually work to our disadvantage. Now, if we do minimum fund in the early years and we intend to max fund for many years,

then of course over time it can overtake the other policies. So what you’re seeing here is there’s no easy answer to this. Some people are gonna say, well, what about the 364 day backdated policy? Well, really the only difference, the illustration is going to look identical to the six month backdated policy, cause they’re the same age individual. However,

you’re getting more premium in faster. So where you see the difference on these backdated policies is that you’re actually getting the opportunity to fund more into the policy faster and you’re getting some cost savings on the insurance side. So by putting those two together, you get a great outcome. If you do one without the other, you’re sort of like offsetting the value of the backdate. So,

with each and every client that we work with, are always trying to get to what is your goal and what is your funding schedule look like. Those people who really like the back dating by almost a full year, by 364 days, are the individuals who have a large sum of money and they’re looking to start their policy off and essentially fast forward.

to the next year in the policy. They’re able to fund the full year one and the full year two all upfront. And then a year from now continue funding the maximum. That is typically where we see a backdate being most valuable. If we’re gonna backdate but not maximum fund because I have to pay more premium sooner, then in my opinion, that’s probably not a very well-designed policy, right? I would rather see the policy maximum amount.

go down for the life of the policy if you want to max fund two years all up front. But note that now you’re limited in how much you can fund in future years. If I’m gonna bring down the maximum premium, that’s going to have an impact on how much you can fund in future years. So each and every scenario is really important here. However, it’s worth considering your scenario and thinking about.

the fact that there is no right or wrong answer for any individual other than something that is crafted specifically for your scenario. There are no easy blanket statements here. So what I’m gonna recommend for you is that if you’re thinking about creating a policy in order to preserve wealth, in order to utilize as a corporate or personal wealth reservoir or an emergency fund,

definitely consider reaching out to us over at CanadianWealthSecrets.com forward slash discovery. And you can hop on a call so we can discuss your particular scenario and run you different situations. If you know exactly what you’d like to fund over X number of years and how and when you want to do that funding, we can help you to run those scenarios and compare them to other situations and other policy structures to make sure.

that you’re getting what it is that you are after. Also, if you’re curious where you are in your own wealth building journey, we encourage you to reach out and head over to the canadianwealthsecrets.com forward slash pathways page where you can take our wealth assessment. What it will do is actually unpack the four stages of our wealth planning system and it will give you.

how well you’re doing in each category, as well as a full report to help you figure out what you should focus on next. Once again, that’s over at CanadianWealthSecrets.com forward slash pathways. We so appreciate you all the ratings or reviews and the referrals that we are getting from our wonderful, wonderful Canadian wealth secret seeker audience. Keep up the great work and we look forward to working with you soon. Just as a reminder, this content is not

advice. It is not investment, accounting, legal tax or financial advice. Please reach out to your advisors for any advice that you would like to put into place. If you’d like to reach out to us, note that I, Kyle Pierce, am a life licensed and accident and sickness insurance agent and the president of Canadian Wealth Secrets Incorporated. And I’d be more than happy to help you plan your holistic wealth management plan. Chat soon.

Canadian Wealth Secrets is an informative podcast that digs into the intricacies of building a robust portfolio, maximizing dividend returns, the nuances of real estate investment, and the complexities of business finance, while offering expert advice on wealth management, navigating capital gains tax, and understanding the role of financial institutions in personal finance.

OPTIMIZE YOUR FINANCIAL FUTURE